Vote: Should we try a new blind / Anti Structure or leave its as is?
(If we decide to have a new structure, we can figure that out later)
New Structure ? / Leave As Is?
12 thoughts on “Vote: Should we try a new blind / Anti Structure or leave its as is?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
To answer Wayne’s question, by dealing to the missing players every hand it takes more cards out of the deck. Therefore draws become statistically less likely. However I do agree that there is no advantage or disadvantage to any one person either way but it would make a difference to guys who like to shove when they flop 4 suited cards, open ended draws, boat draws. Personally I am fine either way but that is the difference. cheers
what about dealing to guys/spots who are not there? Yes the dealer will have to use an extra 1% of his brain but I think we can manage and it might worth a trial?
What would be the purpose or value in dealing to people but there.
I agree with Wayne. If we never deal people who are not in and no money in the pot the card odds are the same for everyone. Personally I think the games works for the most part. If we need to change the time by 30 min or take a break I’m okay with that. I don’t think we should complicate it. It’s about strategy and play against your opponents. If we want to make it more fun then maybe add some more pot luck dinners and social events. It has been over a decade that some of us have been playing together so it’s more than just a game it’s also a social club.
Leave as is.
New start time will shorten the game end time in which the goal of the ante was proposed for.
Leave as is.
I think the numbers look low for this week, who’s in and who’s out?
Leave it (or try it once, no points)
It will cause more loose play near the end. Not sure I like that?
Leave as is
No Ante… you could cut 5 mins off the blinds after the 10:00 top up
Otherwise, leave as is.
Leave it as is.
New structure